But we think the best thing for the IP is to move to Diablo IV in whatever form that’ll be.' The overall sense on the team, at least in my impression, was that there was a vote of no confidence from the executives. "What they told the team was, ‘You’ve finished Reaper of Souls, it’s really good. When it comes to the canceled Diablo III expansion, an anonymous developer claimed that it was apparently abandoned because the higher-ups at Blizzard had deemed Diablo III a failure before the release of the Reaper of Souls expansion, which many believed revitalized the game: Specifically, he brings up the fact that Diablo III's second expansion and a Dark Souls like project were canned by Blizzard. ![]() While he was able to confirm that Diablo IV, currently codenamed Fenrir, does exist, he also interestingly highlighted some notable Diablo-related projects that were canceled at Blizzard over the last five years. ![]() While I think hype culture is partially to blame, I can still agree that Blizzard probably should have unveiled Diablo Immortal alongside another project, namely Diablo IV, which Kotaku previously claimed was in development.įollowing this whirlwind of controversy, Kotaku's Jason Schreier published The Past, Present, And Future Of Diablo today, giving us an in depth look at the current state of the Diablo series and Team 3 a Blizzard. Blizzard's Diablo series has been at the center of a ton of scrutiny since the harsh community backlash to the announcement of mobile game Diablo Immortalat BlizzCon 2018.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |